Waivers don’t shield ski resorts that violate state law from liability, Colorado Supreme Court rules Miller v. Crested Butte, LLC

The pages of fine print that skiers and snowboarders must agree to when hitting the slopes in Colorado — waivers of liability — do not protect ski resorts when resorts violate state laws or regulations, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled Monday.

The ruling, handed down in the case of a 16-year-old girl who fell from a ski lift at Crested Butte Mountain Resort and was paralyzed two years ago, likely ends a years-long push by the ski industry to use waivers to shield resorts against almost all lawsuits, even in cases where ski areas violated state law, experts said.

“It’s a sea change, in terms of ski areas’ responsibilities and consumers’ ability to be protected from ski areas’ negligence,” said Evan Banker, a personal injury attorney at Denver firm Chalat Hatten & Banker. “…From a consumer protection standpoint, it’s huge. Because liability breeds responsibility.”

In their 5-2 decision, the Colorado Supreme Court justices considered a lawsuit brought by Annie Miller and her father, Michael Miller, over Annie’s 30-foot fall from a lift at Crested Butte, which is owned by Vail Resorts. The father and daughter from Oklahoma boarded the Paradise Express chairlift, a four-seat, high-speed lift at the resort, on March 16, 2022.

Annie couldn’t get properly seated, and grabbed the chairlift to keep from falling. Her father and others began to yell for the lift to be stopped as she was dragged forward, but the lift continued with Annie hanging from the chair and her father trying to pull her back to safety.

Eventually, Annie fell and landed on her back. Even then, the lift did not stop, and Michael Miller was forced to ride to the top and ski down to his daughter, who suffered severe injuries and was paralyzed after the fall.

Michael Miller brought a negligence lawsuit against Crested Butte, arguing that the resort employees should have stopped the lift well before Annie fell and that failing to do so violated Colorado’s Ski Safety Act and the Passenger Tramway Safety Act. A lower court ruled much of Miller’s claim was invalid, and he appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court.

Monday’s ruling partially reversed the lower-court decision and allows Miller to continue to pursue the negligence lawsuit against the resort.

Sara Huey, a spokeswoman for Vail Resorts, declined to comment on the ruling because the Millers’ lawsuit is ongoing. In court filings, attorneys for Vail Resorts argued that the lawsuit misstated the precedent in Colorado around private liability waivers, which skiers and snowboarders must agree to when buying lift tickets and passes.

“Colorado courts have upheld private recreational waiver agreements, even where the plaintiff could have (or did) point to a statute regulating the activity,” attorney Michael Hofmann wrote. “The existence of recreational safety regulation has never been enough to prohibit private parties from agreeing that a waiver defense will be available.”

“Big victory for ski safety”

More broadly, the state high court’s decision likely ends efforts by the ski industry to expand the protections that waivers of liability give ski areas.

“This was a big victory for ski safety in Colorado,” said Bruce Braley, who represented the Millers. “It says unequivocally that ski areas cannot force skiers and snowboarders to sign away their rights to protection under the statutes and regulations that govern the ski industry in Colorado.”

The ruling turns back the clock on liability in some Colorado ski accident cases, Banker said.

“For many, many years… everyone sort of agreed that when you sign that waiver you are waiving claims of negligence, but you can always still make claims if the ski area fails to do the things it is required to by law, like maintaining the lift properly,” Banker said.

But since about 2017, the ski industry has been successfully challenging that understanding through targeted litigation, winning key court cases that strengthened the protection afforded by waivers and pushing to essentially provide complete immunity for anything that could happen at a ski resort unless there was gross negligence, Banker and Braley said.

“So what this has done is change that,” Banker said. “It brings us back to the landscape everyone understood it to be many years ago. Which is, you can waive claims of negligence, but the ski area doesn’t get to avoid its legal responsibility, its responsibility in statute and regulations, by having you sign a waiver.”

Adrienne Saia Isaac, a spokeswoman for the National Ski Areas Association, a Lakewood nonprofit that represents more than 300 sk- area members, said it is “too early to tell how the ruling will affect the Colorado ski industry.”

The association argued in court filings both that the lift operator at Crested Butte was not required to stop the lift in response to Annie Miller’s mishap, and that liability waivers do not allow ski areas to get around statutory regulations.

“While chairlift accidents within the reasonable control of ski area operators will never be eliminated, they are rare,” wrote Brian Birenbach, an attorney in Breckenridge representing the National Ski Areas Association. “This will not change by the continued enforcement of liability waivers in the courts.”

Source:  SHELLY BRADBURY | sbradbury@denverpost.com | The Denver Post

Article: Liability waivers don’t shield Colorado ski resorts that violate law (denverpost.com)

$228,000 Jury Verdict for Dog Bite Case

Robert Moreno, age 50, of Denver, CO, owns a residential installation business. On June 15th, 2020, Moreno was installing insulation at a home next the home owned by defendant J.D. age 40. J.D. owned an English Bulldog with which he was walking using a retractable leash.  As J.D. left his home with the dog, it ran towards Moreno and without provocation bit down on his knee and twisted it, tearing Mr. Morenos meniscus. As a result, Mr. Moreno needed surgery on his knee and was unable to work during his recovery. Partner Evan Banker and Russell Hatten represented our clients in this matter. The jury awarded Moreno damages of $228,000, with interest and costs the total judgment was valued at and settled for $301,000. Moreno v. J.D., 2022CV 31398 (District Court, City and County of Denver, Colorado)

$435,000 Jury Verdict for Skier Injured at Steamboat

Quick overview: Our client was descending See Me at Steamboat when he was t-boned on the right side by the defendant. The collision resulted in a fractured hip. This is the first skier/skier collision case tried to verdict in the United States since the Gwyneth Paltrow case. Partner Evan Banker and Russell Hatten represented our clients in this matter. The jury awarded damages of $435,000, With interest and costs the total judgment is expected to exceed $500,000. Foster v. M.B., 2022CV 30020 (Routt County District Court).

Foster v M.B., Routt County District Court, Case No. 2022CV030020 (June 15, 2023).

In this skier v skier case tried by Russell Hatten and Evan Banker, a Routt County jury found 100% liability against the minor defendant who was age 16 at the time of the accident and is referred therefore by his initials “M.B.” 

The jury evaluated the evidence and awarded $173,134.72 for pain and suffering, plus $131,400.00 for economic damages (primarily medical billings) and an equivalent amount, $131,400.00, for physical impairment and/or disfigurement.  Total $435,934.72. Following entry of judgment, the insurer for M.B. paid approximately $525,000 to settle the judgment plus costs and interest, closing the case.

Moral of the story… this was the first full trial of a skier collision case since the highly publicized case of Sanders v Paltrow tried in Summit County, Utah.  Avoiding all of the nonsense, Russell and Evan focused on the facts as set out in the contemporaneous accident reports, the forensic evidence, the medical evidence and imaging showing the fractures and complexity of the care. The weight of the evidence established that M.B. was the uphill skier with plenty of time and space to avoid the collision.  The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff notwithstanding some belief that the Paltrow case had reduced skier collision cases to daytime cable-t.v., soap opera comedy. 

Facts:

On December 27, 2021, both Mr. Foster (age 67) and M.B., were skiing at Steamboat on “See Me.” Foster was a former a NCAA Alpine Skiing Champion, who had skied on the varsity ski team at the University of Colorado. Foster was skiing down the skier’s far right side making short, tight slalom turns at a skiing speed of 10- to 12-miles per hour.

“See Me,” is a “Most difficult,”/Black Diamond trail. It was 50 yards wide with a 17° inclination at the point of the incident. Based upon Steamboat Ski Patrol photographs, GPS measurements, video and aerial photography, our ski safety engineer, Mr. Patrick Kelley, determined that there was more than 200-yards of open visibility on See Me above the area of the collision.

Foster testified that M.B. hit him from uphill at a high rate of speed. M.B. reported to the Steamboat Ski Patrol that he and Mr. Foster, “were both skiing down the mountain taking turns and I was kind of mapping out his turns and I hit a patch of ice right as he made a little bit longer turn than I expected and I just couldn’t get out of the way.”

In the collision, Foster took the brunt of the of the force on his uphill leg – at his right hop. Foster sustained a right proximal femur fracture. He was evacuated from the scene by tobaggon.  M.B. was uninjured.

Mr. Foster was taken to Yampa Valley hospital in Steamboat where an orthopedist repaired his fracture with an intramedullary nail and two fixator screws.  Although the fracture seemed to be healing, in June 2022 Mr. Foster experienced a refracture of the injury.  A second surgery was done with the placement of a more robust plate, screws, and fixation.  There was no claim and no evidence that the Steamboat doctor’s treatment was below standard.  The severity of the fracture, was significant.  A re-fracture was a risk to be expected.  No evidence was presented that Foster failed to follow advice or did anything to cause the re-fracture. 

Foster’s doctor testified that Foster now walks with a limp, he has not returned to skiing, and is limited in his activity. For a former college ski racer, his life was changed. The risk of yet another re-injury limits him.  He has not returned to hiking, riding outdoors, or other activities to which he looked forward during retirement. 

Legal issues: The Court instructed the jury under the Colorado Ski Safety Act:

At the time of the occurrence in question in this case the Colorado Ski Safety Act was in effect.  The Colorado Ski Safety Act states:

Each skier solely has the responsibility for knowing the range of his own ability to negotiate any ski slope or trail and to ski within the limits of such ability… the risk of a skier/skier collision is neither an inherent risk nor a risk assumed by a skier in an action by one skier against another.”  Colo. Rev. Stat. § 33-44-109(1).

Each skier has the duty to maintain control of his speed and course at all times when skiing and to maintain a proper lookout so as to be able to avoid other skiers and objects. However, the primary duty shall be on the person skiing downhill to avoid collision with any person or objects below him.” Colo. Rev. Stat. § 33-44-109(2). 

A violation of these statutes constitutes negligence. If you find such a violation, you may only consider it if you also find that it was a cause of the claimed injuries, damages, and losses.

Each skier solely has the responsibility for knowing the range of his own ability to negotiate any ski slope or trail and to ski within the limits of such ability

Each skier has the duty to maintain control of his speed and course at all times when skiing and to maintain a proper lookout so as to be able to avoid other skiers and objects.

the primary duty shall be on the person skiing downhill to avoid collision with any person or objects below him.

A violation of these statutes constitutes negligence

Settlement Offer:
On April 4, 2023 Defendant made a statutory offer of settlement in the amount of $350,000. Foster turned down the offer.


Expert witnesses:

               Medicine:

Orthopedics – Dr. Michael Shingles, D.O., of Lansing Michigan for Plaintiff. Dr. Shingles testified by video preservation deposition. He testified as to the anatomy, severity, and treatment for the acute injury, the after care, subsequent re-fracture in June 2022 which Dr. Shingles treated, the reasonableness of the care and medical billings, the cause and repair of the re-fracture, and the impairment, pain and suffering, future prognoses, of Foster.  The evidence given by Dr. Shingles was unrebutted.

On Liability:

Patrick Kelley, P.E.  Patrick is one of the most well-respected accident reconstruction and ski safety experts in the United States.  He testified as to the location and terrain of the accident scene, the forces and vectors of the parties.

Long-time defense expert Seth Bayer, P.E. testified for defendant, but admitted on cross examination that defendant was probably the uphill skier based upon the evidence in the case.

Tips for Safe Winter Driving

Winter driving conditions are dangerous. According to the National Highway Traffic Administration, 17% of all injury and death traffic accidents occur during winter driving conditions.  It is important to learn how to drive safely in winter conditions.

Snow, ice, sleet, obscured vision, difficult stopping and turning conditions can make for a challenge for motorists. Here are some tips from Chalat Hatten & Banker to help you drive more safely in the winter months.

Prepare

Have the shop test your battery.  Replace it if its failing. Before you drive in winter conditions do a walk around the car.  Check your headlights, both low and hi-beams.  Check your turn signals, brake lights, 4-ways and interior lights.  Newer cars have “Daytime running lights,” or DRL’s. These are essentially full-time low beam illuminations which make it easier to be seen even during daytime hours.  Pack an emergency bag with warm clothes, gloves and hats, a flashlight, and some water and snack foods so you can get by if you are stuck in traffic or stuck in a snowbank. Make sure you have all the essentials in your car in case you get stuck. A snow shovel and a bag of salt/kitty litter can assist you to dig your wheels out of a ditch and give them traction on the snow/ice. Keep a blanket and bottles of water in your car in case you get stuck and are waiting for help. Other things to have in your car include jumper cables, flashlights, spare tire, window washer fluid and a snow scraper, spare clothes, tow rope and flares.

What conditions are your tires in?  We at the firm usually switch to snow tires at Halloween and go back to road tires on Memorial Day.  This is expensive, but its less expensive than an accident. Make sure your tires are in good condition – this is an important part of the “walk around,” look for worn treads, make sure one tire isn’t flatter than the other 3. Consider checking your spare situation.  Some modern cars don’t come with spares or come with small emergency tires only.  Be mentally prepared to change a tire.  Figure out how to get to the spare, the jack and the tire iron/lug wrench, and how to change the tire on your own.

Check your wiper blades both front and if you’re in a station wagon or SUV, the wiper for the back window. Making sure your windshield wipers and defrosters are working is vital to staying safe while driving in the snow. Right maintained windshield wipers are a necessity; there are also extra blades available that are better fitted to help clear snow from your window shield.

Check your window washer fluid.  This is easy, it’s the plastic container just under the hood.

If you are in an EV, make sure you’re charged up before winter driving.  The battery load on your EV is much higher in cold weather, and you’ll see a decrease in range and remaining time if you are not topped off for a charge.

In gasoline or hybrid cars, the same holds true.  You will see a decrease in MPG because of stop and go traffic, a high load on the engine and battery, and lost traction. Fill it up before you start your journey.

Decrease Your Speed While Driving

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, 24% of annual weather-related auto crashes occur on snowy, icy, or slushy roads. And more than 1,300 people are killed on icy or snowy road conditions annually. The most significant thing to do when driving on slippery roads is to slow down. Stopping on slippery roads may take 2 to 10 times longer to stop compared to stopping on a dry road. Be sure to increase your following distance of another vehicle to 8 – 10 seconds.

Don’t Not Use Cruise Control

You should never use cruise control when driving in winter conditions. You want to be able to have manual control over your vehicle, having cruise control on reduces the driver’s reaction time if you happen to hit a patch of ice and can make it more likely to get in an accident.

Be Mindful of Snowplows

Snowplows have the absolute right of way.  Stay back, don’t pass unless there is clearly an open lane on the snowplow’s left. Don’t tailgate a snowplow. Plows drop de-icer and sand to treat Colorado highways during a snowstorm. Drivers who follow too close risk damage to their vehicle from the de-icer and sand. Snowplows can also stop abruptly. Motorists should leave plenty of room (at least 3-4 car lengths from a plow) to avoid a potentially serious collision.  never pass a snowplow on the right. Snowplows are designed to push the snow, slush, and other damaging debris like rocks to the right of a roadway. Attempting to pass a plow on the right could not only damage a vehicle but also obstruct visibility.

THE DENVER CAR ACCIDENT LAWYERS AT CHALAT HATTEN & BANKER

For more than three decades, the attorneys at Chalat Hatten & Banker PC have helped individuals and their families obtain justice and compensation after a car accident. If you’ve been injured in a car, truck, pedestrian, bus, or motorcycle accident, please call the car accident attorneys at Chalat Hatten & Banker at 720-809-7382 or send us an email below for a free, no-obligation evaluation of your case. We serve clients around the state of Colorado, including Denver, Fort Collins, Boulder, Aurora, Littleton, Colorado Springs, and Pueblo.

Winter Weather Driving Tips: Prepare Your Vehicle | NHTSA

New Colorado Law Set to Raise Damage Caps in Personal Injury, Wrongful Death and Medical Malpractice Cases.

On June 3, 2024, Governor Jared Polis signed into law House Bill 24-1472. The new law increases money damage limits for certain tort actions in Colorado. Here’s what you need to know.

History and current law on the caps on damages in Colorado

The term “civil action” means lawsuits for money damages.  “Civil actions” for personal injuries are rights or claims based upon by an individual’s physical injury caused by someone else’s wrongdoing.  Damages for civil actions for personal injuries fall into two categories: “economic,” or “non-economic.” Economic damages stem from money spent as a result of the harm, including health care expenses and lost income. Non-economic damages are damages for physical pain, suffering, and emotional distress.  

Existing laws setting caps on damages were put onto the books in the 1980’s. As to medical malpractice, the limit was last adjusted in 2005, from $250,000 to $300,000. That limit hasn’t been adjusted since then; and as of June 2024, the limit on noneconomic damages, including wrongful death, for medical malpractice, remains at  $300,000.

As to general personal injury claims such as slip and fall, car and truck accidents, the presumptive limit on noneconomic damages was set in 1986 at $250,000. However, the 1986 statute set up an exception to the presumptive cap which could be exceeded when “the court finds justification by clear and convincing evidence therefor” up to an absolute enhanced cap of $500,000. In 2007 the legislature enacted  a new law intended to restore the damages limitations to the dollar value as to when they were enacted and thus to reflect the effects of inflation. The statute was re-written to provide for cumulative annual adjustments for inflation for each year based upon the consumer price index. As of June, 2024 the presumptive limit for noneconomic damages as adjusted for inflation is set at $729,790. But still the damages may be increased by the court upon clear and convincing evidence up to an enhanced cap – for a maximum of $1,459,600.  These values reflect caps of $250,000/$500,000 adjusted by inflation from the base rate of 1998 to present. This means that what you could buy in 1998 for $250,000 would cost $729,790 today – this is the distressing truth as to how the General Assembly monetizes money damages in personal injury cases.

In 1989 noneconomic losses due to the wrongful death of a family member were defined as “grief, loss of companionship, pain and suffering, and emotional stress, to the surviving parties who may be entitled to sue.” The noneconomic loss maximum was limited to the same value as noneconomic loss for personal injury cases — $250,000. A few years after the personal damages limitation was tied to the consumer price index, the legislature did the same for wrongful death cases. That means that as of June 2024 the wrongful death noneconomic damages cap is $679,990 reflecting just a slight lag behind noneconomic damages for personal injury cases. There are exceptions to the cap, for instance when the act causing the death is a felonious killing.  We see that, for instance, in drunk driving cases.

The 2024 statutes increasing damages for noneconomic damages

Effective Date – Except for medical malpractice cases, the new laws enacted by the General Assembly in 2024, and signed into law by the Governor, are effective to civil actions filed on or after January 1, 2025. The effective date is based on the filing of the claim. The medical malpractice adjustments are only effective as of the date of the injury.

This means that cautious lawyers might advise waiting until after New Year’s Day, 2025, to file a personal injury or wrongful death case arising from negligence.  But medical malpractice cases’ increase on noneconomic damages is only applies to acts or omissions occurring on or after January 1, 2025.

Let’s take a look at how the new law affects civil actions for noneconomic personal injuries.

For civil actions for personal injury damages which are filed on or after January 1, 2025, the bill increases the cap on damages for noneconomic loss for injury to $1.5 million, and starting January 1, 2028, and every 2 years thereafter, the new law adjusts the damages cap based on inflation. There does not appear to be any corollary to the existing law in which damages can be increased, or doubled to an enhanced cap when the court finds by clear and convincing evidence a basis for doubling the award. However, note that the new cap exceeds today’s enhanced cap by just $40,400.  The General Assembly apparently found it to be unnecessary to allow an enhanced limitation based upon the Court’s finding by clear and convincing evidence.

Current law specifies who may sue for wrongful death. The bill adds a sibling of the deceased as a party an eligible family member who may bring a wrongful death action in certain circumstances. The bill imposes a wrongful death damages cap of $2.125 million, and starting January 1, 2028, and every 2 years thereafter, adjusts the damages cap based on inflation. The wrongful death noneconomic damages cap is the largest jump in limits – allowing almost a doubling of permissible noneconomic damages.  

Beginning January 1, 2025, the bill incrementally increases the medical malpractice noneconomic damages cap to $555,000. It treats wrongful death noneconomic losses, that is for grief and loss of the survivors, to the losses defined as noneconomic injury for injury due to malpractice.  These equivalencies are then adjusted upward at specified increments, from $550,000 in 2025, to $810,000 in 2026, to $1,065,000 in 2027, and so on until 2029 when it reaches $1,575,000 for both a wrongfully injured patient’s noneconomic damages and the equivalent for the survivors’ grief and sadness for a medical malpractice wrongful death. Effective 2030, the caps are adjusted biennially for inflation, or until the General Assembly enacts some future legislation and tinkers again with these statutory limitations on the judgments of jurors.

Uncertainties

Certain industries have special caps.  For instance, caps on damages in ski cases are not expressly included or excluded. 

Caps on damages in cases involving a public entity are, as of June 2024, $424,000 for any injury to one person in any single occurrence and $1,195,000 for any injury to two or more persons in any single occurrence, although no one person may collect more than the limit of $424,000.

Jim Chalat, June 11, 2024

Analyzing injuries, crashes and hit-and-runs at Colorado ski areas

It’s absolutely terrifying what is happening at some of these ski areas.”

CHB mentioned in the Colorado Sun:

April 9th, 2024, Analyzing injuries, crashes and hit-and-runs at Colorado ski areas, By Jason Blevins, Colorado Sun (modified for brevity)

Ura Kim was skiing with her husband and friends at Breckenridge in early January 2019 when she was struck by a young skier and shoved into a tree. [The young skier did not stay at the scene to give his name and address as is required by the Colorado Ski Safety Act].

The Kims called Jim Chalat, a Denver attorney who has represented injured skiers for decades. Chalat filed a lawsuit on behalf of Ura Kim, against a yet-to-be-named skier dubbed John Doe.

The lawsuit was enough to get a judge to sign a subpoena for the ski area’s pass-scanning data. Stephen Kim is a software and data engineer who has worked with statistics for more than 30 years. Kim copied the information into a database and built software to search for a young skier and a parent who fit his profile and rode the chairlift shortly after his wife was hit. Mr. Kim and Jim Chalat narrowed it down to a 12-year-old boy and his parents.  Chalat hired a private investigator who called the parents, the mom replied to the investigator’s question about skiing that day at Breckenridge, saying, “My son did not hit that woman.”

The Kims settled with the family’s insurance company. After a couple years of recovery from a broken jaw and broken wrist, Ura Kim has already skied 82 days this winter. She and her husband no longer ski at Breckenridge. 

When Kim called the Summit County Sheriff’s Office to file a report, he says a deputy told him “we have never caught a hit-and-run person.” 

“Something has to change,” Stephen says. “It’s absolutely terrifying what is happening at some of these ski areas.”

Earlier this year the Summit County Sheriff’s Office did identify a snow biker involved in a hit-and-run that injured two skiers at Keystone. The 50-year-old man was charged with leaving the scene of a collision six days after he struck a man and his daughter, leaving them seriously injured. 

Chalat says his personal injury law firm — Chalat Hatten and Banker — gets hundreds of calls a year from injured skiers. 

Lately, he says, “we are seeing a significant increase in hit-and-run.”

“I find it really disturbing because the sheriff’s departments in ski counties either do not have the resources or they do not have the interest in locating these hit-and-run perpetrators,” Chalat says.

Back to School Safety

It’s back to school time. We’re sharing the road with children. They’re walking to school, riding bikes or riding in yellow school buses. Children have reduced standards of care. They are only expected to act as safely as children of the same age, education and experience. That’s the law.

Adult drivers must obey signage and roadway markings for school zones. 20 MPH is the limit. Go more slowly if the circumstances require it. Children can “dart out” in the road at any given moment.

Yellow school buses have specific rights to stop, pick up children and to unload children. While stopped, school buses have special marker lights that you must obey. DO NOT pass a yellow school bus that is stopped dropping off children, it is a serious traffic violation. There are important rules and tips that we can all follow to ensure safety on the road for young commuters.

According to the National Safety Council, most of the children who lose their lives in bus related incidents are 4-7 years old and they’re walking to or from their bus. In 2020, 54 people were killed and 4,800 were injured in school-bus related crashes.

A motorist illegally passing a stopped school bus is subject to a very heavy criminal charge. Never pass a bus from either direction if it is stopped to load or unload children. Remember that the area 10 feet around a school bus is the most dangerous for children. Give children enough space to safely enter and exit the bus and always be cautious of children around you, as they are often unpredictable and tend to ignore hazards.

Bicyclists have the same rights and responsibilities as vehicles on the road, but young cyclists require extra space and attention. Be mindful that children sharing the road with motorists are not able to properly determine traffic conditions as well as an adult can. Young cyclists are more likely to turn in front of you without looking or signaling. Remember to be extra vigilant in school zones and residential neighborhoods.

If you’re dropping children off at school, please remember the following:

  • Educate yourself on the school’s drop-off procedures for the school year.
  • DO NOT load or unload children across the street from the school.
  • Don’t double park, as it could block visibility for other children and vehicles.
  • Carpooling reduces the number of vehicles on the road and at the school.

Denver Motorcycle Accident Results in $500k Settlement

M.B., age 21 was a helmeted passenger on a motorcycle when a car driven by Ms. Robb, an elderly lady from
South Carolina, made a left hand turn and crashed into her. Robb was in a rented car and was given a traffic
citation at the scene of the accident. M.B. was taken to Sky Ridge Medical Center by ambulance and remained
there for two weeks. She was admitted into ICU for a lacerated liver, knee injury and broken hand.

She initially engaged a high-volume, “TV advertising” law firm but felt that “she was not being treated fairly or
communicated with properly.” Her matter involved both a criminal and civil side. Her claims were significant
for huge medical bills and lost income as a personal trainer. Insurance coverage was complicated with low
policy limits on the rental, and two other insurance policies providing coverage for the accident.

Partner Russell Hatten represented M.B. and achieved a $500K settlement on her behalf.

$675K Settlement in Snowmass Ski Accident Case

A.S. was skiing on Sandy Park, an intermediate ski trail at Snowmass Resort at 2:20 PM on Thursday, March 1, 2018.
Cohen was uphill of A.S., flew over a roll and took A.S. out. In the Collision Report Form, ski patrol quoted A.S. at the
scene immediately after the collision saying “I got hit in the back.”

A.S. sustained multiple right-sided rib fractures, thoracic bleeding and collapsed lung (hemopneumothorax), a right
clavicular displaced fracture, and associated pulmonary injury. He spent four days in Aspen Valley Hospital, all in ICU.
Aspen Valley Hospital could not manage the hemopneumothorax and emergently transferred him to St. Anthony
Hospital in Lakewood, CO. He would spend an additional twenty-one days there.

A lawsuit was filed by Chalat Hatten & Banker, but the claims were settled before trial for $675,000.
Partner Russell Hatten was the lead attorney on the case.

6 Tips for a Safer Bike Commute

Commuting by bike on urban streets is much different than a casual ride on a bike path. It is inherently more dangerous, things are moving a lot faster, there is more commotion, and it’s a lot louder. Being a confident and safe bike commuter requires preparation, some knowledge, a little practice and a few pieces of safety gear.

Before hitting the city roads on your bike, make sure to evaluate your comfort and only do as much as you’re comfortable with. Whether you’re new to bike commuting or not, here are some city-riding rules to keep in mind to help keep you safe:

“Hold Your Line” (aka Ride Straight, Stay in Your Lane, and Be Predictable)

Holding your line isn’t a term just for group rides and racing; this rule is one of the most important things you can do on a commute to help keep you safe out on the road too. Looking straight ahead and keeping your eyes where you want to go, instead of down at your wheel for example, helps you ride straight and predictably. Following this rule increases your ability to avoid and navigate potential obstacles in your path and avert any abrupt swerves, stops or illegal movements that can endanger you and others around you. 

If you’re riding with or near other cyclists, maintain a safe distance to avoid overlapping your front wheel with the rear wheel of another bike. If the cyclist you’re “half-wheeling” makes a sudden move, it could cause both of you to go down. 

Going hand in hand with riding as predictably as possible is communicating to cars, pedestrians and other cyclists around you. Always use hand signals when you need to turn, stop and slow suddenly.

Plan Your Route

Chances are you are already familiar with how to get from point A to point B by car. But keep in mind, what may feel easy or comfortable in a car may not be so fun on a bicycle so it’s important to plan your bike route before heading out. For safety and comfort, off-street bike paths and protected bike lanes should always be your first choice. If these are not an option, plan your bike route on well-used bike lanes on lesser-trafficked streets, or quiet back streets where speed limits are lower. If you are planning on commuting to work, it is a good idea to test your route on a day off so you can time it.

Honor The Rules of The Road

Colorado law defines bicycles as vehicles. This means that in addition to a specific set of bicycling laws, many of the same legal rights and duties that apply to motorists also apply to cyclists. If you’re on a street without a designated bike lane, for example, you are allowed to use the same lane as other motorists and you are allowed to take up as much space as a normal automobile would. In these cases, make sure to leave as much space between you and the car in front you to avoid other drivers from trying to squeeze in too closely. If you’re honked at, maintain composure and don’t feel pressured.

Sidewalks are intended for pedestrians, not vehicles. Because bicycles are considered vehicles in Colorado, bicyclists are prohibited (with a few exceptions) from using sidewalks. Biking on the sidewalk is allowed if the sidewalk is part of a designated bike route, if a bicyclist is delivering a paper, or when a bicyclist is within one block of preparing to mount/dismount. The speed limit for a cyclist riding on a sidewalk is 6 MPH.

Following the rules not only keeps you and others safe, but also makes you a good champion and advocate for the biking community as well.

Use the Turning Lane or Make a Box Turn

Although it may feel uncomfortable, if there is no bike infrastructure to maneuver otherwise, use the same lane as other motorists to turn left at an intersection. Remember to use your hand signals to make other drivers aware of your intentions.  

If there are too many lanes to cross, the roads are busy, you’re nervous or if you’re unable to use the intersection for other reasons, use a box turn. A box turn is a maneuver when you proceed a small distance through an intersection on the right as you normally would, then stop at the far corner of the perpendicular street where you intended to turn left, wait for the traffic signal then ride with that flow of traffic.

Ride Defensively

Although cyclists have an equal right to use the public roadways, they are often bullied and subject to impatient drivers. Cyclists are far more likely to suffer severe or even fatal injuries because there are little to no structural elements that protect them from harm, making it even more important to ride defensively. Be aware of your surroundings and never assume drivers see you. Wear reflective gear, bright colors and use lights to increase your visibility. And always wear a helmet. 

Look Out for Road Hazards & Obstacles

Cyclists are very susceptible to road hazards such as potholes, debris, loose rocks, and gravel. While riding, always keep an eye out for any obstacles in the road. 

Do your best to avoid potholes as they can often lead to flat tires and crashes. Take corners carefully as well – city street corners tend to accumulate gravel which can cause you to slip out if you turn hard or at a high speed.

Road hazards become even more dangerous with poor weather conditions. Avoid puddles, as you don’t know what is underneath, as well as manhole covers, light rail tracks, roadwork plates. Because they are metal, they can become very slick in the rain or snow. Turning or riding on or over them can be very dangerous. 

Finally, watch out for people. Pedestrians, often distracted by cell phones, step into bike lanes or crosswalks and jaywalk when there’s a gap in traffic. If the weather is bad, use extra precaution as pedestrians tend to take longer crossing the street and umbrellas can block a person’s line of sight. And depending on the time of day, be cognizant of the glare from the sun and use caution when riding near bars as alcohol impairment can compromise judgement.

Denver Bicycle Accident Attorneys

As avid riders ourselves, we have a close understanding of the rules and dynamics of bicycling, both on the road and on a trail. We also know that even the most experienced cyclists are not devoid of risks and dangers.

If you or a loved one were seriously injured in a bicycle accident or have questions about an incident you were involved with, please call us. We have extensive experience in bicycle cases an